Blogs

November 11, 2016
 

Casino Royale (1967) vs. Casino Royale (2006)

casino-royale-0

Seeing as everything from The Crow to Commando is being lined up for the remake treatment in the coming months, it seems like a good time to have a look back over how other cinematic revamps have fared.

In particular, it’s the two Casino Royale movies that show how differently a similar story can play out. Whilst James Bond has become one of modern media’s most instantly recognisable characters, the difference between the Bond of the 1967 film and the 2006 movie couldn’t be more marked.

The sleek Martin Campbell-directed film of 2006 introduced Daniel Craig in his first performance as the British spy. It showed a relatively cool Bond who was a world away from the cheesy Roger Moore performances of the 1980s. And whilst Craig still seems to have an ambivalent relationship with the Bond character, it managed to stop the franchise from becoming a self-parody.

Such a composed image was one that the 1967 movie gleefully tore apart. Instead the anarchic spy comedy revelled in having no less than six actors pretending to be 007. Star turns included the likes of Peter Sellers playing the role of a baccarat master, whilst Ursula Andress delivered a typically glamorous take on the Vesper Lynd character.

What’s most surprising is that both movies claim to have their inspiration in the Ian Fleming novel of the same name. But that’s where the similarity ends, as the 1967 film has baccarat being Bond’s game of choice, whilst the 2006 movie sees Bond involved in a high-stakes poker game.

Although we can all learn to master baccarat thanks to the quick and easy guide at the Red 8s online casino site, understanding the tangled plotlines of the 1967 Casino Royale isn’t quite as simple a task. Famous movie critic Roger Ebert declared it to be ‘possibly the most indulgent film ever made’, and although spy spoofs have had a better recent time with the Austin Powers franchise, this movie is a bit of a creative misfire.

However, that’s not to say that the 2006 Casino Royale completely eclipsed the 1967 movie. This is because the 1967 film had a great soundtrack that included Dusty Springfield’s fantastic take on the Burt Bacharach classic ‘The Look of Love’, whilst the 2006 movie had to make do with Soundgarden’s Chris Cornell performing the instantly forgettable ‘You Know My Name’.

But whilst there’s a lot of discrepancy in the games of baccarat and poker, and in the musical and casting decisions, it’s clear that both movies are in thrall to the endlessly fascinating figure that is James Bond.

Share Button


About the Author

Eoin Friel
Eoin Friel
I grew up watching JCVD, Sly and Arnold destroy bad guys, blow things up and spew one-liners like it's a fashion statement. Action is everything I go to the movies for and the reason I came up with this site is to share my love for the genre with everyone. We also want to help promote new talent whether you're making blockbusters, low-budget Indie movies or fan films; if it's action, it's awesome.



 
 

 
paar-sword

Titus Paar Talks The Perfect Weapon

Titus Paar is the director of the recent Steven Seagal movie The Perfect Weapon which also stars Johnny Messner, Richard Tyson, Sasha Jackson and Vernon Wells. It’s a tribute to Blade Runner and the action movies fro...
by Eoin Friel
 

 
 
28530

Sinbad and the War of the Furies Out Now

After kicking some major ass in Hercules Reborn, John Hennigan is back, and this time, he has a sword. On a treasure hunt gone wrong, modern-day adventurer Sinbad accidentally releases the Furies, three beautiful but terrible a...
by Alex Paul
 

 
 
bros-1

Brand New Luke Goss Interview

It’s been a while since we caught up with Luke Goss and he’s been a busy man; he is getting his band Bros back together for a UK tour and has several movies in development. We chat with Luke about working with Steve...
by Eoin Friel